Reflections: still inspecting
(Ufficio Scolastico Provinciale) muove agli insegnanti, riguardo i criteri di valutazione utilizzati nelle pagelle del primo quadrimestre. On March 28, 2009, the 27 teachers Longhena that were inspected by the MIUR (Ministry of Education, University and Research), directed by Dr. Lelli, received a letter concerning the complaints that the USP (Provincial Education Office ) moves to teachers about the evaluation criteria used in the first quarter report cards.
Here are some thoughts that I submit to CGSL, while stressing the purely informal character of my observations, having no legal competence to assess the state of facts, even referring to those responsible technical and expert evaluation.
I think once again necessary to highlight two key issues.
One, on solidarity, on other occasions, expressed to the teachers throughout the school, particularly to teachers that they felt best knowledge and belief of applying the criterion of numerical evaluation, by virtue of the absence of specific skills to this criterion. And this, of course, not inability but because of lack of information and time to make an assessment so delicate and important, that, that yes, it would create confusion and inconvenience,
both in children than in families. I think, again, that the procedure used in assessing pupils for the first quarter is consistent with the mode of teaching has been clearly explained to families who have fully understood the reasons and accepted, signed and delivered by teachers report cards . Just basing teachers' knowledge, direct knowledge of the teachers of my daughter, indirect knowledge of teachers at meetings of interclass the last four years, on the occasion of the feast of late as last year, during the evening of October 15 2008 (one night for the school). I, in all sincerity, say that teachers are very valid, that you take extreme care of small children values, giving them time and space to express emotions, as well as teach with joy and serenity disciplines for which they are extremely competent. I have just a small example of a recent audit that my daughter told me. The audit covered the sciences, in particular amphibians. My daughter has built a story between mother and his little frog. In the dialogues between the two explained the physical and biological environment in which they live, how to reproduce infibi. In short, using tools literal has exhibited his scientific expertise. And I am sure my daughter is no exception. This example, we could all make a thousand others, to emphasize that you can (should) learn while having fun, developing techniques other than "ministerial." It 's a bit the opposite of what happened in my day when I heard that I was "way off topic, maybe just because I had this issue in an unusual way. I think this has happened to many of us, in their forties (and a bit 'below), who had the "pleasure" to know the teacher only with time and quality of school Extremely low.
The other issue is twofold, linked to the figure of the headmaster. I think, even for professional experience, a good manager should always support the team out soils. If only for professional consistency. Longhena give the school names as "anarchy," "Carnival", to name a few, it seems to support the incomplete leadership.
Regarding the relationship managers and parents are once again underlining the atypical situation. As parents we are unable to establish a comparison with the manager, who has so far rejected any request for meeting our part to enable a proper relationship between leaders and parents. This is extremely serious, since anti-democracy and participation in school-family relationship, than to go in the opposite direction with what is stated in the regulations in the proposed training institution of the school. From a purely formal point of view this is also a sign of aberration and questionable managerial conduct.
Since matter is the leader, in addition to denying the invitations made by parents, has publicly insulted the parents, with the declaration issued at various newspapers.
For this reason I consider it necessary, from parents all express dissent towards full management so far conducted by the executive, which has created a climate of uncertainty and anxiety in parents, as well as teachers, in contrast with the climate participation and general harmony that has always characterized the life of the school. Finally, I must by all parents, the request for a formal apology to parents that the manager must be for them apostrophe as anarchists, carnival, incompetent, irresponsible, who entrust their children to non-qualified teachers. I do not feel any of this. On the contrary, I am extremely proud as a person and as a parent to the school Longhena have the honor to be able to entrust my children to school teachers Longhena certain that with their help, citizens will become aware of a country who may not deserve them.
Anna Maria Angradi
Source: SemplicementeLonghena
IMPORTANT
This site is temporarily suspended for lack of time and collaboration
Recent Comments