Reflections: Still on the inspection
(Ufficio Scolastico Provinciale) muove agli insegnanti, riguardo i criteri di valutazione utilizzati nelle pagelle del primo quadrimestre. On March 28, 2009, the 27 teachers Longhena that were inspected by the MIUR (Ministry of Education, University and Research), directed by Dr. Lelli, received a letter concerning the allegations that the USP (Provincial Office of Education ) moves to the teachers about the evaluation criteria used in the first quarter report cards.
Here are some thoughts that I submit to CGSL, while stressing the purely informal considerations of mine, having no legal competence to assess the state of the facts, even referring to the proper technical and competent evaluations.
I think once again necessary to highlight two fundamental issues.
One, on solidarity, on other occasions expressed to the teachers throughout the school, especially to teachers who have not felt in science and conscience to apply the criterion of numerical evaluation, because of the absence of specific skills to that criterion. And this, of course, not failure, but due to lack of information and time to make an assessment so delicate and important, that, that yes, it would create confusion and discomfort,
in children, in families. I think, once again, that the procedure used in assessing pupils for the first quarter is consistent with the mode of teaching, has been clearly spelled out to the families who have fully understood and accepted the reasons, signatures, school reports delivered by teachers . Just basing teachers' knowledge, direct knowledge of the teachers of my daughter, indirect knowledge of teachers during meetings interclass the last four years, on the occasion of the celebration as the end of last year, during the evening of October 15 2008 (one night for the school). Can I, in all sincerity, say that teachers are very valid, that you take extreme care small values of students, giving them time and space to express emotions, as well as teach with joy and serenity disciplines which are extremely competent. I have just a small example of a recent audit that my daughter told me. The audit covered the sciences, specifically amphibians. My daughter has built a story between the mother and her little frog. In the dialogues between the two explained the physical and biological environment in which they live, how they reproduce infibi. In short, the literal use of tools has exhibited his scientific expertise. And I am sure, my daughter is no exception. This example, but we could all make a thousand others, to emphasize that you can (and should) learn while having fun, developing techniques other than "ministerial." It 'a little' the opposite of what was happening in my time, when I say that I felt I was "gone off topic", maybe just because I had tackled the subject in an unusual way. I think that's happened to many of us, forty years old (and a little 'below), who had the "pleasure" of knowing the single teacher, with time and quality of school Extremely reduced.
The other issue is twofold, in connection to the Headmaster. I think, even for professional experience, a good manager should always support the soil to the outside collaborators. If for no other professional consistency. Give the school Longhena names as "anarchy", "Carnival", just to name a few, it seems incomplete to support capacity management.
As for the relationship management and parents are once again underlining the atypical situation. As parents we are unable to establish a comparison with the manager, who has so far rejected any request from our meeting, to enable a proper relationship between leaders and parents. This is extremely serious, as detrimental to democracy and participation in school-family relationship, as well as in the opposite direction to what is stated in the regulations in the proposed educational institution of the school. From a purely formal point of view, this too is a sign of aberration and of questionable executive conduct.
From the managerial point of view of substance, in addition to deny meeting requests made by parents, he publicly insulted the parents, with the statements made in various newspapers.
For this reason I consider it necessary, by all parents, to express disagreement with the full management thus far conducted by the executive, which has created a climate of uncertainty and anxiety in parents, as well as the teachers, in contrast with the climate participation and overall harmony that has always characterized the life of the school. Finally, I consider it necessary, from parents all the request for a formal apology to the manager must be parents, apostrophized them as anarchists, carnival, incompetent, irresponsible, who entrust their children to non-qualified teachers. I do not feel any of this. On the contrary, are extremely proud, as a person and as a parent, to be part of the school Longhena to have the honor to entrust my children to school teachers Longhena, certain that with their help citizens become aware of a country that may not deserve them.
Anna Maria Angradi
Source: SemplicementeLonghena
Recent Comments